Unclassified

419 CATALOGUED

These are catalogue entries whose nature has not been settled. Something was recorded at a position, with a brightness and often a size, and the source catalogue stopped short of saying what class of object it is. They are kept because they are real observations, and because the cross-references that point at them would break if they were dropped.

BY CONSTELLATION · 66 REGIONS
[

THE SCIENCE OF UNCLASSIFIED

] 2 CARDS

Why a class goes unresolved

Usually because the evidence available does not decide it. A faint smudge may be a distant galaxy or a nearby cluster of stars; a point source may be a star or something much further away with a spectrum nobody has taken. Historical catalogues also carry entries that were never confirmed by a second observer, and those stay on the books rather than being quietly deleted.

What is recorded anyway

Position, and usually a magnitude and an angular size. That is enough to point a telescope, enough to match the entry against other surveys, and enough for it to be found again — which is what a catalogue is for. Classification is a later step, and one that a future survey may supply.

[

COMMON QUESTIONS

] 7 ANSWERED
How does an object end up here?
Either the source catalogue never assigned a class, or the classes it used do not map onto the ones this site publishes. Both are recorded as unresolved rather than guessed at.
Are these mistakes?
Some are. Historical catalogues carry entries nobody has since managed to re-observe, and a few of those were probably errors at the eyepiece. The rest are real detections waiting for a spectrum or a deeper image.
Can they be searched and cross-matched like anything else?
Yes. They carry positions, designations and whatever photometry the source recorded, so they resolve by name and by coordinate exactly as a classified object does.
Does the category shrink over time?
Slowly. Every large survey settles some of what was previously ambiguous, and each release moves entries out of here. It never empties, because the same survey also finds new things it cannot classify.
Why keep entries nobody can classify?
Because the observation is real even where the interpretation is missing, and because other catalogues cite these entries by number. Removing them would silently break those references and would also hide the fact that the sky contains things not yet accounted for.
Will these ever be identified?
Many will. Classification usually needs a spectrum or a deeper image, and successive surveys supply both for more of the sky each decade. Some historical entries, on the other hand, are probably errors of observation and will never resolve into anything.
Does an open classification mean the object is unusual?
Usually not. The commonest reason a class is left open is a faint object seen once, which is the ordinary condition of most of the sky rather than a sign of anything strange. The genuinely odd entries are a small minority, and they tend to be the ones that get followed up first.