- How does an object end up here?
- Either the source catalogue never assigned a class, or the classes it used do not map onto the ones this site publishes. Both are recorded as unresolved rather than guessed at.
- Are these mistakes?
- Some are. Historical catalogues carry entries nobody has since managed to re-observe, and a few of those were probably errors at the eyepiece. The rest are real detections waiting for a spectrum or a deeper image.
- Can they be searched and cross-matched like anything else?
- Yes. They carry positions, designations and whatever photometry the source recorded, so they resolve by name and by coordinate exactly as a classified object does.
- Does the category shrink over time?
- Slowly. Every large survey settles some of what was previously ambiguous, and each release moves entries out of here. It never empties, because the same survey also finds new things it cannot classify.
- Why keep entries nobody can classify?
- Because the observation is real even where the interpretation is missing, and because other catalogues cite these entries by number. Removing them would silently break those references and would also hide the fact that the sky contains things not yet accounted for.
- Will these ever be identified?
- Many will. Classification usually needs a spectrum or a deeper image, and successive surveys supply both for more of the sky each decade. Some historical entries, on the other hand, are probably errors of observation and will never resolve into anything.
- Does an open classification mean the object is unusual?
- Usually not. The commonest reason a class is left open is a faint object seen once, which is the ordinary condition of most of the sky rather than a sign of anything strange. The genuinely odd entries are a small minority, and they tend to be the ones that get followed up first.