Exoplanets

6336 CONFIRMED

An exoplanet is a planet orbiting a star other than the Sun. The first confirmations came in 1992, and thousands are now known, most of them found not by seeing the planet but by watching what it does to its star. The population that has turned up is nothing like the Solar System: the commonest planets found so far are larger than Earth and smaller than Neptune, a size our own system does not contain.

[

THE FAMOUS ONES

] 12 ENTRIES
BY CONSTELLATION · 88 REGIONS
[

THE SCIENCE OF EXOPLANETS

] 4 CARDS
1.0000.98571.4% deep−1.7 HMID-TRANSIT+1.7 H
WASP-12 B ACROSS WASP-12 · DEPTH 1.4 PER CENT, WHICH IS THE PLANET’S STORED RADIUS OVER ITS HOST’S, SQUARED · THE STAR IS DRAWN AS WIDE AS THE CROSSING LASTS, SO BOTH HALVES SHARE ONE CLOCK · CROSSING TIME 3.3 HOURS FOR A CENTRAL CHORD, WHICH IS THE LONGEST THE ORBIT ALLOWS — THIS CATALOGUE DOES NOT STORE HOW FAR OFF CENTRE A GIVEN TRANSIT RUNS · ONE EVERY 1.09 DAYS · THE VERTICAL AXIS SPANS A FEW PER CENT OF THE STAR’S LIGHT AND NOTHING HORIZONTAL IS EXAGGERATED

The transit method

If a planet's orbit happens to pass across the face of its star from our line of sight, the star dims by a fraction of a percent for a few hours, and does it again every orbit. The depth of that dip gives the planet's size relative to the star, and the interval gives the period. It only works for the small share of systems aligned edge-on to us, which is why the method finds many planets and misses most.

+206 m/s206 m/s0TOWARDS US · BLUESHIFTAWAY · REDSHIFTONE ORBIT25%50%75%2.22 D
THE HOST OF HD 189733 B, MOVING 206 METRES PER SECOND EITHER WAY ONCE EVERY 2.22 DAYS · COMPUTED FROM THE STORED PLANET MASS, HOST MASS, PERIOD AND ECCENTRICITY THROUGH THE TWO-BODY PROBLEM, NOT DRAWN TO SHAPE · A CIRCULAR ORBIT, WHICH IS WHAT THIS ONE'S FIT SAYS · AN INCLINATION IS KNOWN FOR THIS SYSTEM, SO THE MASS BEHIND THE AMPLITUDE IS A MASS

The wobble method

A planet does not orbit its star so much as the two orbit their common centre of mass, so the star traces a small circle of its own. That motion shifts the star's spectral lines blue then red, once per orbit, and the size of the shift gives a minimum mass for the planet. Combined with a transit it gives the mass and radius of the same body, and therefore its density — the only route to knowing whether a planet is rock or gas. The speeds involved run from a few hundred metres a second for a hot Jupiter down to nine centimetres a second for an Earth twin — which is why no spectrograph has yet found one.

’95’00’05’10’15’20’25’26
Transit · 4676 · watching a star dimRadial Velocity · 1197 · watching a star wobbleMicrolensing · 282 · watching a star brighten as another passesImaging · 98 · seeing the planet itselfOther methods · 83 · timing, astrometry and the rest
6336 CONFIRMED PLANETS BY THE YEAR THEY WERE ANNOUNCED, FROM 1992 TO 2026, COUNTED OFF THIS CATALOGUE’S OWN ROWS · THE TALL YEARS ARE NOT BETTER YEARS: 2016 HOLDS 1504 BECAUSE A SURVEY VALIDATED A BACKLOG OF CANDIDATES AT ONCE, WHICH IS WHY THIS IS BARS AND NOT A CURVE · A PLANET WHOSE YEAR THE ARCHIVE DOES NOT GIVE IS NOT ON THE CHART AND NOT IN THE TOTAL

A count that moves in jumps

The number of known planets does not grow smoothly, because confirmation does not. A survey watches the same field for years, accumulates candidates, and then validates a batch of them in one pass — which puts a thousand planets into a single year and almost none into the year before it. Reading a chart of that as a rate of discovery would be reading the release calendar of one telescope.

What the habitable zone is not

The habitable zone is the band of orbits where a planet with the right atmosphere could hold liquid water on its surface. It is a statement about distance from a star and nothing else. A planet inside it may have no water, no atmosphere, or no surface at all, and moons well outside one can be liquid inside from tidal heating. Where a system has enough measured about it, each planet page draws the zone around its own star: Kepler-186 f is inside its red dwarf's, at two-fifths of the Earth's distance from the Sun, because the star is that much fainter.

[

COMMON QUESTIONS

] 9 ANSWERED
Why did it take until 1992?
The signals are tiny. A Jupiter dims its star by about one per cent as it crosses the face, an Earth by one part in ten thousand; the wobble a Jupiter induces is about twelve metres a second, and an Earth about nine centimetres a second. Spectrographs crossed the Jupiter threshold in the mid-1990s and have still not reached the Earth one. The 1992 planets came from a different signal again: millisecond irregularities in the ticking of a pulsar.
Which kinds are easy to find, and which are common?
Big planets on short orbits are easy: they block more light, tug harder, and repeat often enough to confirm quickly. Correct for that bias and the commonest planets appear to be between the size of Earth and Neptune — a class with no example in this Solar System.
What can actually be measured about one?
A transit gives the radius and the orbital period; the star's wobble gives a mass. Both together give a density, which is what separates a rock from a ball of gas. For a hundred or so, starlight filtered through the atmosphere during a transit gives a rough composition.
Who finds them?
Mostly space telescopes watching for transits — Kepler, which stared at one patch of sky from 2009, and TESS, which has been sweeping nearly the whole sky sector by sector since 2018 — with ground-based spectrographs measuring the masses afterwards. Gaia adds the positions and the JWST the atmospheres.
Do they have names?
Almost none do. A planet takes its star's catalogue name and a lower-case letter in order of discovery, starting at b: Kepler-22 b, Proxima b. Some 160 have been given proper names by IAU public vote.
How many exoplanets are known?
More than six thousand confirmed, and the figure moves every few weeks as candidates are validated. The confirmed list is a poor guide to how common planets are, because it reflects what the surveys were able to detect; statistical work on those same surveys suggests planets are the rule around stars rather than the exception.
Have we found another Earth?
Nothing that has been shown to be Earth-like. Several planets are close to Earth in size and sit in their star's habitable zone, which is where the resemblance stops — for almost all of them the mass, the atmosphere and the surface are unmeasured. Detecting an atmosphere on a small rocky planet is at the edge of what current instruments can do.
What is the closest one?
Proxima Centauri b, about 4.25 light-years away, roughly Earth's mass and inside its red dwarf's habitable zone. That zone is very close in for such a faint star, so the planet is likely tidally locked and exposed to strong flares. It has never been imaged; it is known from the wobble it puts in its star.
Can we see them directly?
About a hundred, and only under favourable conditions: a young, hot, massive planet still glowing from its own formation, orbiting far from a star whose light can be blocked out. The rest are known indirectly. The planet-to-star brightness contrast is the obstacle, and it is the problem the next generation of telescopes is being built to attack.